The fraud of pantypopo, and/or ‘she may not have intended harm, but it’s a problem that so many forwarded this rubbish’

On our Facebook page recently, a commenter quoted from a trans-critical blog of a few years’ age, OUT OF MY PANTIES, NOW!!! by blogger pantypopo, which purports to give startling statistics about trans males’ sexual offending and criminality.

Here are the reasons for STC not endorsing this blog (there may be other potential reasons as we have not read it all):

1.   The blogger appears to invent her figures, or to derive them from combining figures from inappropriate sources – often works whose meaning she has not taken the time to understand.

2.   She appears not to care about the effect of her actions on the reputation of the gender abolitionist cause.

3.   Her actions help stigmatise a population sector which already includes some very vulnerable elements. While trans* males are as likely to offend sexually as other male-born people, trans* males in some social sectors – especially youth and racialised – can be especially victimised. Female-born trans* people are adversely affected by a crude conflation of ‘transgender’ and ‘sex offender’ which is based on a reading (correct or not) of male statistics. Girls and women tend to be propelled into transgenderism by the mistreatment of our sex (hoping to be treated better as males), and so we cannot afford this kind of crudeness which reduces transgenderism to sex offending.

In this 2013 (and still frequently circulated) article, ‘When is 90% not Substantially ALL?’, she begins:

88% of the transgender population, those people who are protected by gender identity and gender expression laws, are, as reported by their own advocacy organizations, males with a psychosexual disorder. (1)


Scrolling down to see what reference number 1 is to check who provided the 88% figure, we find:
Now, one does not normally work out percentages by combining the figures given by two different organisations, who presumably used different survey or calculation methods. That in itself would normally be enough to consider a result worthless.

But the next question – where the 88% comes from – is quite a puzzle. I noticed that if I subtracted the lower transsexual population figure from the lower total transgender population figure – .25% from 2% – I reached 1.75% as the proportion of the US population which is non-transsexual but transgender. That is 87.5% of 2%.

Perhaps that explains the 88%, but this only perplexes one more – why would those lower figures be the ones to select?

And the problems don’t end there. How does any of the above mean that the (very vaguely) referenced organisations believe that USA non-transsexual trans people are “males with a psychosexual disorder”? This was the first we’ve heard of a gender breakdown in these statistics.

After this 88% claim, pantypopo continues:

Many men with psychosexual disorders practice their fetish in the privacy of their own homes. But as many as 13,946,348 of them in the US, at the time of this writing, will be free to practice their fetish in public, in front of your children, in women’s locker rooms, in the girls bathroom at school. (2) This will be enabled by current and pending transgender legislation throughout the US. (3)

 

Again, I feel I am up shit creek without a paddle. I found a 2013 account of the USA population – 316.5 million – and calculated 1.75% of that, assuming that pantypopo was concerned about the non-transsexual (totally all male) transgender section of the population. But I reached approximately 5.54 million.

Could I work backwards? Dividing 13,946,348 by 316,500,000, I reached 4.4% of the US population. No clue as to where that was from. Could she mean that she feared the legislation then planned would enable a larger proportion of male fetishists or offenders to do this in females’ facilities (i.e. she was no longer referring to transgender or cross-dressing males)? Given how broad some pro-trans legislation is, that seemed plausible. But the references at the end were of little help:Just for the hell of it, I searched for that 13,946,348 figure at Gender Identity Watch, and came up empty-handed save for a reference to this same piece by pantypopo.

Moving on! (Yes, there’s more.) Our blogger continues:

Transgender fetish is the largest sexual disorder reported in convicted sex offenders.(4) Almost 100% of convicted sex offenders have a documented history of transvestism, crossdressing, free-dressing, Autogynephilia, transsexualism – in other words: TRANSGENDER.

60% of convicted sex offenders have transgender fetish as their primary paraphillia (a parapillia [sic] is a psychological sex disorder). Of the remaining fetishists, such as pedophiles, rapists, etc., 60% of those sex offenders have transgender fetish as their secondary parapillia [sic], in addition to their primary disorder. Finally, 40% of convicted sex offenders have transgender fetish as their tertiary (3rd) fetish among multiple disorders.

This reference takes us to:
What we find here is not, as promised, a breakdown of the proportion of convicted sex offenders who have some transgender-related paraphilia. We have, instead, a study, published in 1988, solely of paraphiliacs who reported their own acts of paraphilia but are not all stated as having been convicted of such acts. While this study is unclear on that, it is certain that this is no research on how many convicted sex offenders have a trans or cross-dressing paraphilia.  Therefore there is no claim in the article similar to pantypopo’s that “Almost 100% of convicted sex offenders have a documented history of transvestism, crossdressing, free-dressing, Autogynephilia, transsexualism”.

Is she, perhaps, correct that “60% of convicted sex offenders have transgender fetish as their primary paraphilia”? Not according to this source, at least. The authors distinguish between transsexualism and transvestitism. They stress that they do not consider the former to be definitely a paraphilia, and have partly included it within this study in order to shed light on whether it should be classified that way in future, and to explore other correlations:

pantypopo 5 non-paraphilia.PNG
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, Vol. 16, No.2, 1988. P. 156. (Or p. 4 of linked pdf of this study)

Their tables indicate that some participants demonstrated both transsexualism and transvestic behaviour.

Now, the 60% – where was this from? The closest I could find was this table:

pantypopo 4 paraphilia occurrence.PNG
ibid, pdf p.8

But as can clearly be seen, this table does not display primary paraphilias, but denotes what percentage of each category of paraphiliac had specifically one paraphilia, how many had two, how many had three, etc. Therefore, the ‘Transsexualism’ line tells us that 51.7% of transsexuals had no other paraphilia, 31% had another, 13.8% had two others, and 3.4% had three others.

It is true that if one adds the ‘transsexualism only’ and ‘transvestitism only’ figures then one reaches 58.2% (yes, nearish to 60%). But this says neither that 60% of sex offenders have a trans-related fetish, nor that 60% of paraphiliacs do. What it does is specify the percentage of study participants who are transsexual or ‘transvestitic’ (according to this now unfashionable designation) and have no other paraphilias. Pantypopo might do well to consider the meaning of that.

As far as the claim that “Of the remaining fetishists, such as pedophiles, rapists, etc., 60% of those sex offenders have transgender fetish as their secondary parapillia [sic], in addition to their primary disorder” goes, my best guess is that pantypopo assumed the second column to mean not “has more than one paraphilia”, but “has it as secondary paraphilia”. And duly added the Transsexualism and Transvestitism figures in that column (31.0% and 29%) in order to total 60%.

Frankly, I feel this pantypopo is a menace when allowed near figures, as she doesn’t seem to have allowed her lack of interest/ concern in what exactly the figures represent to have daunted her undoubted enthusiasm for combining them in a near-random fashion.

Her following claim, “40% of convicted sex offenders have transgender fetish as their tertiary (3rd) fetish among multiple disorders”, is apparently reached via the same method.

I believe this gives us the interesting feat of an article on the correlations between sex offending and transgenderism comprising claims which are – every single one of them – wrong.

Since responsible commentary on this research from pantpopo is unlikely, I will add here that:

  • It shows that 52% of transsexual subjects had no paraphilias (transsexuals mainly being included in the study for interest’s sake, as the authors warned).
  • 24% of transsexual participants had another studied condition which the authors specified was not a paraphilia, but was also included for interest’s sake: “ego-dystonic homosexuality”. (This is another outdated category designating being homosexual but not having accepted that.) What this adds up to meaning is that of the studied transsexuals, 52% had no paraphilia and a further 24% mostly had trouble accepting their homosexuality. That’s right. So much for the grand, lurid claims by pantypopo of a huge trans-paraphilia correlation.

    64.5% of ‘transvestic’ participants fitted into three or more categories, i.e. definitely engaged in behaviours beyond fetishistic cross-dressing and homosexuality.

  • This is, as we said before, a 1988 study. Since transgenderism is very much socially created, the two studied constructs here of ‘transsexualism’ and ‘transvestism’ (obviously, a male-centred practice) do not perfectly align with modern transgender identities. Individuals who have had SRS are more likely these days to identify as ‘transgender’ rather than ‘transsexual’, and individuals without SRS are less likely to “cross-dress” in private while identifying themselves as men in public.

    So regardless of pantypopo’s irreverence towards the practice of reading, the study’s conclusions should still not have been applied too incautiously towards currently trans-identifying male individuals.

Pantypopo then concludes, on the basis of these claims, that “Transgender sex disorders are the leading indicator of criminal sexual behaviour”. The nett effect of her false claims has been to portray trans people (not even trans males more narrowly) as the most likely sex offenders. 

Pantypopo’s article then moves to what appears to be links to media reports of trans criminal offences. While one would hope that she would find this less difficult, I think we can agree that anything provided by her is best if double- or triple-checked. And, hopefully, used as a lesson in not assuming that anything with a ‘%’ sign next to it is a valid contribution to one’s cause.

 

Fake facts, because courtesy is gendered

Hard-hitting reporting from RACHEL JOHNSON:

As it turns out, it wasn’t like that at all. Brannen was born male – but we readers weren’t allowed to know that.

It’s not that this detail wasn’t important (and as I will argue, m’Lud, it’s crucial) or forgotten. It was omitted in the moral panic around both privacy and ‘misgendering’, the progressive cause de nos jours.

To call someone by the wrong title is considered verbal assault and even bigotry.

And it’s largely fear of misgendering that has led to the courts perpetrating, and the press reporting, a fake fact – that women can and do rape men – rather than telling us the literal truth.

It’s largely fear of misgendering that has led to the courts perpetrating, and the press reporting, a fake fact – that women can and do rape men – rather than telling us the literal truth

Last week, the courts decided to wave aside inconvenient aspects of biology and law (rape is defined as intentionally penetrating another person with your penis against their will, and only males have penises) because they were dealing with something far more important than truth, or indeed, statute.

They were dealing with a situation where a man identified as a woman. And his right to identify as a woman trumped our right to know the actual facts, as opposed to the ‘alternative facts’.

This case exposes like no other the stupid way our courts and our Parliament – and, I’m afraid, the press – are being sucked into the prevailing moral panic over misgendering, the cause that’s fast overtaken feminism as the go-to civil-liberties issue of our times. 

It was this panic that prevented us from reporting or reading that Katie Brannan was born a man, and had a penis – two facts completely central to this case. You have to know them otherwise – think about it – the charge wouldn’t be rape. 

Full article here

Cherno Biko who works for the Sylvia Rivera Law Project and is a Co-Chair of New York City’s Young Women’s Advisory Council publicly admits to raping transman.

 

“The first time we had sex I can barely remember, as it followed a night of drinking and smoking but I know that we broke two of the most important rules… consent and safe sex. When he told me that he felt used and violated, I immediately apologized and offered to support in whatever way I could.

The next morning I called my mother in tears and asked what happens when the victim turns into the abuser?

Wow, this whole article is some serious bullshit. No, Cherno Biko you misspoke, it was not “we broke two of the most important rules… consent and safe sex.” It was YOU who broke those two important rules. YOU penetrated your partner without consent and without using a condom. YOU did that, that’s why YOU are a rapist and abuser. Stop blaming your victim for your actions and, no, it is not “respectability politics” to hold rapists accountable for their actions.

Oh hell, it’s get’s worse. OK, this admitted rapist who is trying to re-frame himself as not your average rapist but the socially aware kind of rapist, this rapist is a Co-chair of the New York City Young Women’s Advisory Council.
“The Young Women’s Initiative will analyze available data, examine the City current investments, and identify where the City can make a lasting impact. Together with experts in women’s issues and racial and gender inequality, the Young Women’s Initiative will also determine needs for programming, policy changes, data collection, and long-term research geared towards closing the gaps in outcomes experienced by young women and girls, and young women and girls of color in particular, in New York City.

The Young Women’s Initiative’s final recommendations will generate a blueprint for New York City’s efforts to improve the lives of girls and young women, including:

• Policy and legislative recommendations that promote and support shifts in institutional practice.
• Budgetary recommendations for programs and services that are currently underfunded to serve this population.
• Long-term research on key issues that should be a public priority, but either lack data or merit further investigation”

Great, Biko can work for programs to teach women to always respect a rapists preferred pronouns.

Biko also works for the Sylvia River Law Project (SLRP) a trans right organization that likes to promote the rights of rapists to be housed in women’s prisons. This is the organization that Laverne Cox got in trouble for working with to lend support to women killers and child rapist murderers. SLRP has a pretty sordid record for supporting the rights of convicted rapists to be legally female and to be housed in women’s prisons, so it looks like Biko fits right in.

Cherno Biko is an admitted rapist in his own words, he has no business representing the rights on young women and in helping determine policy on their behalf.

Snakes and Mushrooms: The List Transgender Activists Refuse to Make – A List to Tell True Trans (TT) From Predatory Creepy Men (PCM) From TT Who Are Also PCM (TTPCM)

 

poisonous mushrooms.PNG

shrikecentral

Transgender activists love telling real women that there is no danger from allowing men who claim to be women into women’s spaces. The fact that there are men who claim to be women who have attacked and killed women is ignored or disbelieved by these activists, as is the fact that men who claim to be women offend criminally as much as all other men as a class do.

For the sake of argument, however, let us assume that all men who claim to be women are perfect angels who pose no threat to women. That still leaves the issue of how allowing men who claim to be women into women’s facilities also allows all men, even rapists and perverts, in women’s spaces. The transgender activists tell real women that only trans are allowed in and often claim that even if other men come in, women should/would be able to…

View original post 593 more words

Are Transwomen a Threat in Women’s Spaces?

My Only Path to Power

Conservatives are borrowing “myths” from feminists to undermine transgender bathroom policies, said an article shared by my ex. Trans people just aren’t a threat, the article insisted.

Below, a list of the people who undermine the credibility of that claim. Not radical feminists, not conservatives. These guys, who unfortunately for the trans movement, do exist (and in large numbers).

Due to the oppressively large body of source material to work from, this is a work in progress and will updated from time to time.

genericRobert Whitehead
Dressed as woman to photograph women in ladies’ restrooms
Took “multiple photos of different women in bathroom stalls  around the city with their pants down.”

genericChristopher Todd Gard
Assaulted, choked 8-year-old in restroom while armed, wearing only women’s underwear
Arrested on complaints of aggravated assault and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, possession of a firearm during a felony, kidnapping and indecent exposure.

genericRichard Rodriguez
Dressed…

View original post 611 more words

M2F Davina Ayrton jailed for raping teenager

‘At the end of the trial the judge said it was likely Ayrton would be held at a male prison.’
He’d better be.

Transgender woman Davina Ayrton jailed for raping teenager

 

Davina Ayrton
Image copyright PA

A transgender woman who raped a teenager while still living as a man has been jailed for eight years.

The 15-year-old girl was attacked by Davina Ayrton – then called David – in a garage in 2004.

Ayrton, 34, denied the assault but was found guilty at Portsmouth Crown Court. She was placed on the sex offenders register for life.

Judge Ian Pearson described the rape as “traumatic” and said the “scars and effects will never leave” the victim.

‘Lived in fear’

During the trial the court heard the victim screamed and shouted during the attack and told Ayrton to stop.

In a statement, she said: “As the years have passed, I have never forgotten the incident, how he forced himself on me, I was hysterical and I lived in fear all the time.

“I thought I was a real tough cookie but clearly I wasn’t.”

‘No physical changes’

The prosecution was brought after a care worker reported Ayrton had confessed to the crime and told them she felt like a “paedophile” who had “always known there was something wrong with me and I need help”.

Ann-Marie Talbot, defending, said Ayrton was abused as a child and was sorry for what she has done.

The defendant said she had not “made any physical changes or enhancements” to her body or taken any medication. She changed her name in 2012.

At the end of the trial the judge said it was likely Ayrton would be held at a male prison.

“Don’t worry about predators” says M2F rapist

Via PRIVILEGE DENYING TRANNY:

 

A reader sent me some interesting information the other day.  Apparently our old pal, Jonathan “Johanna” Wolf is still lurking about comments sections, telling women off for being bigots, cause they don’t want men like him in their bathrooms.  Things got a bit heated in the  comments section for K5 Seattle article about a Man in a Woman’s locker room.

Our friend thought one of the virulent trans activists seemed very familiar. Turns out it was Johanna Wolf, the man who was convicted of raping a deaf girl and feels like he’s the victim.

 

wolf ca

Yep, Johnny is at it again, spreading propaganda about how bigoted we all are and how NO PERVERTS EVER would want to access women’s spaces for nefarious purposes.  After being called out for being the rapist piece of shit he is, Jon Jon deleted all his posts and attempted to get the person banned from Facebook for “hate speech” or “bullying” or some such bullshit. Luckily, our reader had the foresight to screen cap all of Johanna’s comments before he deleted them. Let’s have a look shall we?

wolf1

wolf2

wolf3

wolf4

http://sexoffender.publicrecordrepository.com/45/61/456180-jonathan_adrian_wolf.pdf

jaw

 

Article continues here

 

 

 

Reginald Cathanie Artis (USA)

Gender Identity Watch

11988580_746101188835165_4195570281796196351_n

Reginald Cathanie Artis was 24 when he pleaded guilty in 1987 to one count of forcible sodomy of a 17-year-old boy. According to a news report at the time, the 1987 conviction came three years after Artis – he lettered in three sports at Great Bridge High School – was convicted of sexually battering a 16-year-old boy. He was sentenced to 13 months in jail in that case, but the entire sentence was suspended on the condition he stay out of trouble.

Virginia petitioned for a civil commitment based on likelihood of reoffending. Dr. Stephen C. Ganderson, a clinical psychologist, has diagnosed Artis with an unspecified personality disorder with narcissistic, avoidant and antisocial traits. The doctor believed the disorder makes it likely Artis will continue to engage in violent sexual acts.

Artis is a transgender woman now.

Civil commitment_ Laws allow authorities to keep people locked up indefinitely_

Va. AG wants more prison for…

View original post 16 more words

Male rapist and child pornographer identified in press as a “woman”

smirk 1

oh, that winsome autogynephile smile

pic from here

Joseph David Fialkowski who was previously in the press for suing to change his legal name to Julianna Tourmaline Fialkowski is being reported in the press as a woman rapist as can be seen here, Lynchburg woman indicted on rape charge”

The news report reads as follows:

“A Lynchburg woman was indicted by a grand jury Monday on felony rape and abduction charges stemming from an August incident involving a juvenile, according to the Lynchburg Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office. 

Julianna Tourmaline Fialkowski, 25, faces one count each of felony rape; abduction with the intent to defile; enticing another into a dwelling with intent to commit a felony; strangulation; and misdemeanor assault, according to the indictment.

Harrison had no comment about whether the charges on which Fialkowski was indicted occurred during the production of child pornography. 

Fialkowski was also a trans activist who was also in the news back in April of this year for removing a minor from their home without the parents consent. Fialkowski claimed to have met the minor online and that the minor was threatening suicide.

smirk2

pic from here

Lynchburg transadvocate arrested after assisting at-risk youth

“A transwoman from Lynchburg, Virginia, has been arrested and charged with contributing to the delinquency of trans youth after being accused by the youth’s parents.

According to Julianna Fialkowski (top image), 25, she found out about the unnamed, 17-year-old transmale after a cry for help went out on the social media site Facebook late last month. The youth claimed that he was self harming- adding that he was suicidal.

Fialiowski said that she was also led to believe that the youth was being forced out of his house.

Fialkowski, a transadvocate and a LGBTQ rights activist, made headlines in May 2014 after a Virginia Circuit Court Judge denied her a name change- reversing his decision after public outcry.

Fialkowski found the youth’s house through an internet search, and accompanied by a prayer chaplain from a local trans support group, went to the home to offer their assistance. After a dispute between the youth and his parents, the youth left the house, indicating to that his father had kicked him out and that he had permission to leave.

Fialiowski said that she and the prayer chaplain, Lindy Ramsey, took the youth to Ramsey’s home where he was offered a place to stay temporarily, an offer the pair claimed they had made the youth’s parents aware of.”

In the same post we also have a screen cap and link to a tumblr post where a young person claims to have been victimized by Julianna Fialkowski and warns other youths in the area to stay away from him. Here again is the screen cap and link